Perceived distance and obesity: It's what you weigh, not what you think.

نویسندگان

  • Mila Sugovic
  • Philip Turk
  • Jessica K Witt
چکیده

Action abilities are constrained by physical body size and characteristics, which, according to the action-specific account of perception, should influence perceived space. We examined whether physical body size or beliefs about body size affect distance perception by taking advantage of naturally-occurring dissociations typical in people who are obese but believe themselves to weigh less. Normal weight, overweight, and obese individuals made verbal distance estimates. We also collected measures of beliefs about body size and measures of physical body size. Individuals who weighed more than others estimated distances to be farther. Furthermore, physical body weight influenced perceived distance but beliefs about body size did not. The results illustrate that whereas perception is influenced by physical characteristics, it is not influenced by beliefs. The results also have implications for perception as a contributing factor for lifestyle choices: people who weigh more than others may choose to perform less physically demanding actions not as a result of how they perceive their bodies, but as a result of how they perceive the environment.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

قانون طلایی تدارک حمایت از دانش آموزان با نیازهای ویژه در کلاسهای فراگیر: از دیگران آنطور حمایت کنید که دوست دارید از شما حمایت کنند

Consider for a moment that the school system paid someone to be with you supporting you 8 hours a day, 5 days a week. Now, imagine that you had no say over who that support person was or how she or he supported you. Or imagine that someone regularly stopped into your place of employment to provide you with one-on-one support. This person was present for all your interactions, escorted you to th...

متن کامل

It Ain’t What You Do (But the Way That You Do It): Will Safety II Transform the Way We Do Patient Safety; Comment on “False Dawns and New Horizons in Patient Safety Research and Practice”

Mannion and Braithwaite outline a new paradigm for studying and improving patient safety – Safety II. In this response, I argue that Safety I should not be dismissed simply because the safety management strategies that are developed and enacted in the name of Safety I are not always true to the original philosophy of ‘systems thinking.’

متن کامل

Editorial: What Is Brain Mapping?

G20 World Brain Mapping Initiative (Neuroscience/N-20) is Putting Brain Mapping on the top of Global Economic Issues The Society for Brain Mapping, Therapeutics, and Brain Mapping Foundation are propelling therapeutic advances in Nano-Neurosurgery, Nano-Bio-Electronics, Artificial Intelligence, Neuro-Supercomputing and ‘cross-pollination’ among the bio-medical sciences and engine...

متن کامل

Whale song

was revived with the emergence of cognitive ethology. And the cycle of excess is being repeated, I think. All animals are proving to be really, really clever, and, more remarkably, in very human-like ways. Hmmm. That's not a very interesting kind of evolution. And I wonder if a lot of the results we're getting don't have more to do with the way we're conceptualizing the problems we put to anima...

متن کامل

Fun Boy Three Were Wrong: it is what you do, not the way that you do it

I decided to talk about modularity because many people — including myself — assert that spreadsheets (and other programs) should be modular. Fewer can state with precision what this means, or why it's good. It's like Dilbert's boss, as described by AI researcher Michael Covington's excellent presentation How to Write More Clearly, Think More Clearly, and Learn Complex Material More Easily [Covi...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Acta psychologica

دوره 165  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2016